|
|
| |
Converting a Traditional
IRA to a Roth:
Clues to Resolving a Confusing Conundrum
(With Conversion Calculation Tables)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
In the scheme of your retirement, estate and
financial planning, converting your traditional IRA that is subject to income
tax at the time of distribution to a Roth IRA, from which distributions are
income tax free, may be one of the more challenging exercises that you
undertake. However, making the right decision now may create a cash benefit in
the future for you and your beneficiaries in the tens or hundreds of thousands of
dollars. The Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act (enacted in 2006)
removes the $100,000 income limit for converting funds in a traditional IRA to
a Roth IRA beginning after 2009. This creates a planning opportunity for many
people who are not currently eligible to convert traditional IRAs. It also
creates opportunities for individuals who have rolled or who may roll
retirement plan benefits to IRAs and those who may be eligible for in-service
distributions from employer sponsored retirement plans.
After refreshing your IRA understanding, this
article discusses the conversion conundrum and then provides clues for you to
follow to resolve your particular conversion conundrum.
BACKGROUND. The traditional IRA is
funded with tax deductible contributions and the withdrawals are taxed to the
owner/beneficiary as ordinary income. With limited exceptions, withdrawals
prior to age 59½ are subject to a 10% penalty and distributions must commence
no later than the owner attaining age 70½. Those not eligible to make
deductible contributions because of participation in an employer sponsored
retirement plan and income in excess of certain limits may make nondeductible
contributions. Withdrawals of the earnings are taxable income.
The Roth IRA is funded with after‑tax
contributions. After you attain age 59½ and the Roth IRA has been open for 5 years,
withdrawals of all amounts are income tax and penalty free. In addition, there
is no requirement that you commence distribution at age 70½.
THE CONUNDRUM: whether to convert the
traditional IRA to a Roth IRA? This decision requires that you consider many unknown
factors such as the tax rates that will be in effect at the time you commence
distribution, how long you will survive after you begin withdrawal, and whether
you intend to use your IRA to benefit next generation beneficiaries. Most
significantly, the opportunity to convert comes at the cost of paying income
tax on the amount converted at the time of conversion. This is the actual and
philosophical obstacle that is the greatest challenge in the conversion
conundrum. Paying tax earlier than is required flies in the face of the
fundamental tax principle of deferral.
Conventional wisdom would say that you should
defer taxes on your IRA investment until retirement, which is a time when most
people are in a lower income tax bracket. To maximize the conversion benefit,
non-IRA funds should be used to pay the tax due on the amount converted.
Although this is a painful feature of the conundrum, for those under age 59½
this avoids the penalty that would apply to the IRA funds used to pay the tax
and by using non-IRA funds to pay the tax, the entire IRA balance compounds tax
free after the conversion.
In order to evaluate a possible Roth IRA conversion,
you should take the following factors into consideration:
1. Age at conversion and estimated age at retirement (or default to age 70½
because the traditional IRA is subject to the lifetime minimum distribution
rules);
2. Estimated rate of return on investments;
3. Income tax rate at the time of conversion and the estimated income tax
rate at the time of withdrawal; and
4. The duration over which you expect your IRA to provide benefits to you
and perhaps your children (who, because of your hard work and sacrifice, will
earn more than you and be in a higher tax bracket at the time of distribution
to them).
At the time of conversion you will know your
age and your current marginal income tax bracket. We cannot prognosticate what
will happen to income tax rates 5, 10 or 20 years from now. We do know that the
marginal tax rates are scheduled to increase in 2011. This prompts planning
now for conversion in 2010. Following is a table of income tax rate changes
scheduled to take effect in 2011:
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
25%
|
becomes
|
28%
|
|
28%
|
becomes
|
31%
|
|
33%
|
becomes
|
36%
|
|
35%
|
becomes
|
39.6%
|
Will you really “retire” at age 65 or will you
change careers, become a consultant or transition to a reduced work schedule? Will
your spouse continue to work even after you retire? Although you may believe that
your non-IRA investments will only be taxed at 15% for dividends and capital
gain, do not underestimate the income tax impact of required minimum
distributions from a traditional IRA and/or pension or profit sharing plan.
Beginning in 2011, the marginal income tax rate for single taxpayers with
current income between $31,850 and $77,100 and married taxpayers filing jointly
with income between $63,700 and $128,500 increases to 28%. Part time or
continued employment plus taxable required minimum distributions could keep
your taxable income in a higher tax bracket than you may expect.
Faced with many unknowns and contradiction of
conventional wisdom, how should you proceed to determine whether conversion from
a traditional to a Roth IRA may be advantageous to you and your beneficiaries?
CLUES. Following are some clues to
help you resolve your Roth conversion conundrum.
1. Calculators.
“Roth Conversion Calculator” inserted in the internet
search engine of your choice will yield many online tools to assist you. The
nearby conversion calculation table demonstrates the effect of conversion under
certain assumptions. To use the table, find your current age and current tax
rate and estimated tax rate during the time that you will take distributions.
For example, consider the 50 year old currently taxed at 35% who expects
his/her marginal tax rate to drop to 28% in retirement. The table uses $100,000
so that for comparison purposes you can easily convert your own IRA as a
percentage of the table. For example, if your IRA balance is $25,000, then your
results will be 25% of the values in the table. The table assumes that
distribution would commence at the required beginning date at age 70½ and
assumes an average annual return on investment of 8%. The table above assumes
that the entire value of the traditional IRA is taxable and the $35,000 (35% x
100,000) tax to be paid at the time of conversion will be paid from non-IRA
assets. The manner in which the advantage (or disadvantage) has been
calculated for each respective age and tax bracket in the table is demonstrated
below using this 50‑year old IRA owner.
|
Age 50
35% Current/
28% Future Tax Rate
|
Roth
Conversion
|
No Conversion
Traditional IRA
|
|
IRA balance
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
|
Age 50 Non IRA assets
|
$35,000
|
$35,000
|
|
Conversion Tax
|
($35,000)
|
0
|
|
Earnings on IRA at 8%
until age 70 ½
|
$366,096
|
$366,096
|
|
After tax earnings on
Non IRA asset compounded at 8% less 35% tax for 20 years.
|
0
|
$61,467
|
|
Taxes paid at
distribution from IRA
|
0
|
($130,506)
|
|
Net after tax cash to
owner at 70 ½
|
$466,096
|
$432,057
|
|
Roth advantage
|
$34,039
|
|
Be careful not to make the conversion decision
a purely mathematical exercise. If there is a real likelihood that you will
need the IRA funds within five years of conversion, you will lose the benefit
of tax free treatment of the earnings, so conversion of this portion of your
traditional IRA may not be wise.
If your actual and projected tax rates are not
reflected in the table, use the closest rates as a guide. For example, if you
are age 50 and currently in the 33% bracket and expect to be in 28% bracket,
look at the 35/28% results. Because the initial tax paid at conversion will be
less, the conversion benefit will be slightly greater because the tax paid at
conversion will be less. If your age is between the 5‑year brackets in
the table, look to the next older age. If it is advantageous for someone older
and in your tax bracket to convert, then it will be advantageous for you.
2. Distribution Duration.
For purposes of the table, the comparison is
shown at the commencement of distribution. However, it is unlikely that anyone
would withdraw the entire balance at age 70½. Going back to our example of the
50-year old at the 35/28% marginal brackets, consider the following example demonstrating
the benefit of withdrawing the $466,096 in substantially equal payments of
$40,636 over 20 years (assuming average 6% earnings). Because the Roth IRA does
not require minimum lifetime distributions, there is an opportunity to create
an even greater benefit for next generation beneficiaries. See clue number 5
below.
|
Age 70 ½
28% Tax Bracket
|
Roth
Conversion IRA
|
No Conversion Traditional IRA
|
|
Pre-distribution
balance at age 70 ½ earning 6% annually
|
$466,096
|
$466,096
|
|
20 annual payments
|
$40,636
|
$40,636
|
|
Less tax
|
0
|
($11,378)
|
|
Distribution of the
tax saved by not converting plus after tax earnings
|
0
|
$146,016
|
|
After tax cash
available to owner over the 20 years
|
$812,727
|
$731,174
|
|
Roth advantage
|
$81,553
|
|
3. Consider Other
Retirement Assets.
If you participate in other employer sponsored
retirement plans that will pay a taxable benefit during retirement, this
benefit, combined with your traditional IRA distributions, may push you into a
higher tax bracket in retirement. With the exception of those near retirement,
the table generally indicates a Roth advantage for those whose income tax rates
do not drop significantly in retirement.
4. Tax Opportunities.
If circumstances are such that you can avoid
taxes at the time of conversion because of operating losses or other tax
losses, you avoid the issue of paying taxes now or then. If your tax on
conversion is zero, then you can accomplish the conversion without the current
tax cost. This is why Roth IRAs are so beneficial to student workers. In most
cases, they can fund their Roth IRA with the income from part-time jobs and
because they pay little or no income tax, the student worker pays no tax to
fund the Roth and they will pay no tax in the future on the compounded return.
5. Estate Planning.
Avoiding required lifetime minimum
distributions during the owner’s life gives you the opportunity to hold assets
in the Roth IRA, compounding tax free, while you exhaust other taxable income
producing assets during your lifetime. If you need the Roth IRA assets then they
are available but there is no required distribution during your lifetime. At
your death, if your children are in a high tax bracket, the tax free Roth
distributions would be a tremendous benefit to them. In this case, the
“disadvantage” shown in the conversion calculator table may not exist. For
example, consider the 60‑year old in the 35/28% now and then tax brackets.
At age 70½, the Roth IRA is valued at $179,085. If this owner survives 15
years to age 85, does not withdraw assets from the Roth IRA and earns an
average 6% return, the Roth value will be $429,187. If the child beneficiary
is age 55 at the time of the owner’s death and the child takes only the
required minimum distributions, compare the following results:
|
Age 60
35/28% Tax Brackets
|
Roth
Conversion IRA
|
No Conversion Traditional IRA
|
|
Value at age 70 ½
6% return
|
$179,085
|
$179,085
|
|
Required minimum
distribution
|
0
|
$162,134
|
|
Value at age 85
|
$429,187
|
$211,100
|
|
Required minimum
distribution over the 30 year life expectancy of beneficiary
|
$1,213,000
|
$575,440
|
|
Tax (28%)
|
0
|
($161,123)
|
|
Plus distribution of
tax saved by not converting to Roth and earnings (estimated at 4 ½% tax free
over child's 30‑years)
|
0
|
$178,224
|
|
Net after tax cash to
child beneficiary
|
$1,213,000
|
$592,541
|
|
Roth advantage to
child beneficiary
|
$620,459
|
|
This conversion calculation does not
"reinvest" the pre‑tax $162,134 required minimum distributions
during the owner's lifetime and it does not attempt to determine the impact of
estate taxes. However, it is clear that the longer the time for tax free
compounding, the greater the Roth advantage for the next generation
beneficiary.
6. Hedge.
Too much information? Too many unknown variables?
Hedge. There is no requirement that you convert an entire IRA and no limit on
the number of conversions. If your annual income does not exceed $100,000, you
do not need to wait until 2010 to make a conversion. You can make partial
conversions as your circumstances permit to meet your planning objectives. Consider
mixing and matching your assets between traditional pre-tax and some Roth IRA assets.
This approach may take the sting out of the income tax payment at conversion by
spreading the tax over multiple conversions. But, as noted above, income tax
rates are scheduled to increase in 2011 so spreading conversions into years
after 2010 will be more costly.
CONCLUSION
Do not avoid the conversion conundrum because it appears difficult. Defaulting
to no action may penalize both you and your beneficiaries. The Roth conversion
conundrum is not resolved solely by mathematical formula. Calculators will
help you, but they should only be one tool that you use in making the decision.
If your annual income exceeds $100,000, you have time before 2010 to take pencil
to paper and apply the clues set forth above. Now is the time to sit down
with your financial and estate planning advisors to determine the best solution
to your conversion conundrum.
Conversion
Calculation Table
|
Age
|
Tax Rate at Conversion/
Tax Rate at Distribution
(%)
|
Present Traditional
IRA Value
|
Years to
distribution at age 70½
|
Estimated
average
investment
return
|
Roth Value
at 70½
|
Traditional IRA net of tax as of
distribution date plus the taxes paid at conversion
with after tax earnings to distribution date
|
Roth conversion advantage
(disadvantage)
|
|
35
|
35/28
|
$100,000
|
35
|
10%
|
$2,810,242
|
$2,340,554
|
$469,688
|
|
35
|
33/15
|
$100,000
|
35
|
10%
|
$2,810,242
|
$2,708,057
|
$102,185
|
|
35
|
28/15
|
$100,000
|
35
|
10%
|
$2,810,242
|
$2,707,842
|
$102,400
|
|
45
|
35/28
|
$100,000
|
25
|
10%
|
$1,083,470
|
$949,067
|
$134,403
|
|
45
|
33/15
|
$100,000
|
25
|
10%
|
$1,083,470
|
$1,087,914
|
($4,444)
|
|
45
|
28/15
|
$100,000
|
25
|
10%
|
$1,083,470
|
$1,080,180
|
$3,290
|
|
50
|
35/28
|
$100,000
|
20
|
8%
|
$466,096
|
$432,057
|
$34,039
|
|
50
|
33/15
|
$100,000
|
20
|
8%
|
$466,096
|
$489,944
|
($23,848)
|
|
50
|
28/15
|
$100,000
|
20
|
8%
|
$466,096
|
$482,001
|
($15,905)
|
|
55
|
35/28
|
$100,000
|
15
|
8%
|
$317,216
|
$303,265
|
$13,951
|
|
55
|
33/15
|
$100,000
|
15
|
8%
|
$317,216
|
$341,852
|
($24,636)
|
|
55
|
28/15
|
$100,000
|
15
|
8%
|
$317,216
|
$334,494
|
($17,278)
|
|
60
|
35/28
|
$100,000
|
10
|
6%
|
$179,085
|
$180,253
|
($1,168)
|
|
60
|
33/15
|
$100,000
|
10
|
6%
|
$179,085
|
$201,164
|
($22,079)
|
|
60
|
28/15
|
$100,000
|
10
|
6%
|
$179,085
|
$194,962
|
($15,877)
|
|
65
|
35/28
|
$100,000
|
5
|
6%
|
$133,822
|
$138,730
|
($4,908)
|
|
65
|
33/15
|
$100,000
|
5
|
6%
|
$133,822
|
$153,937
|
($20,115)
|
|
65
|
28/15
|
$100,000
|
5
|
6%
|
$133,822
|
$148,342
|
($14,520)
|
For additional information, please contact:
David M. Mosier, Esq.
Knox, McLaughlin, Gornall & Sennett, P.C.
120 West Tenth Street
Erie, Pennsylvania 16501-1461
Telephone (814) 459-2800; Fax (814) 453-4530
E-mail:
dmosier@kmgslaw.com
This Guide and any information in it is not to be reproduced
in whole or in part, in any medium, for use by others without
the prior, express written consent of Knox McLaughlin Gornall
& Sennett, P.C. |
|
BACK TO TOP
|
|
|
|
| |
Release
Date:
April 2007
Contact:
David M. Mosier, Esq.
Knox McLaughlin Gornall & Sennett, P.C.
120 West Tenth Street
Erie, Pennsylvania 16501-1461
Telephone (814) 459-2800
Fax (814) 453-4530
E-mail: dmosier@kmgslaw.com
|
|
|